News that Gets My Goat:
-Last
week, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst appointed Sen. Dan Patrick to head the State
Education Committee, instigating what’s sure to be a costly and time-consuming
distraction from the business of the upcoming session of the Texas Legislature;
that is, vouchers, or “school choice” as it’s well-funded advocates call it
these days.
“To
me, school choice is the photo ID bill of this session. Our base has wanted us
to pass photo voter ID for years, and we did it.”
If
by “base” he means major campaign contributors, he’s right, with deep-pocketed
warbucks such as Bob Perry and Dr. James Leininger spending millions in recent
years supporting candidates who will press their pet cause in the Legislature
at the state and federal level.
-In
David Brooks’ post debate column he lauds the new Moderate Mitt, saying that
after being pushed to the extreme mean of his party in the primaries, Romney
has come to his moderate self just in time to reach mainstream voters in the
November election.
Romney
recalled the success of his bipartisan efforts as Massachusetts Governor and
spoke of the friendship between Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neil. (Best buds huh? O’Neil was appalled that
Reagan didn’t come to work before ten in the morning, and that he wouldn’t read
his briefings.)
So
Windsock Willard has done another one-eighty, just in time, he hopes, to close
the deal on his leveraged buyout of the Electoral College. But shouldn’t voters
wonder about the intentions and probable effects of a leader who has shown that
he’ll say anything to get elected? It may well be that “moderation” is not a
prudent course.
-I
was reading about “the low-information voter” again today. That guy is all over
the news, lately. Today he was cited by U of H political scientist Richard
Murray in a Chronicle article about County Attorney Vince Ryan facing Robert
Talton, a retread from the right wing of the State Legislature. “It’s just
mostly which team you’re on, and a little bit how your name looks. We’ve got a
lot of low-information voters in county elections, more so in presidential
years.”
“Which
team you’re on” is a good lead-in to the subject of straight-ticket voting, a
subject Patricia Kilday Hart addressed in her column “Two reasons to avoid
straight-ticket voting.” She points to a pair of races that could be decided by
people ‘outsourcing their vote’ by voting a straight slate that would result in
the election of flawed and inferior candidates; one from each party. Sheriff
Adrian Garcia and District Attorney Mike Anderson each face candidates who made
it through their party primaries notwithstanding their history of misconduct in
professional life and the attendant reprimands and other sanctions they’ve been
awarded.
Years
ago when I was a precinct chair in Houston, a transsexual convicted murderer
made in on the ballot for County Chair against an able incumbent whose name
contained a more than ample amount of consonants. Though, as an elected party
official, I was “sworn to support all Democratic candidates,” I confess that I
spent hours on the phone trying to insure that my precinct would not vote to
elect an ex-con to lead the local party into derision, if not disgrace.
Hart concludes: “In our hyper-partisan world,
it’s easy to award our votes to candidates strictly based on party affiliation.
This year, in Harris County, that would amount to voter malpractice.”
